How is feedback provided?

Feedback on student performance is provided by both

• numerical ratings
• qualitative information detailed in the feedback sections

Each item is rated on the following five point rating scale or as insufficient observation (I/O) or not applicable (N/A).

1. Performs Unacceptably
2. Performs Marginally
3. Performs Adequately
4. Performs Proficiently
5. Performs with Distinction

A rating of 3 is considered a passing grade.

The above rating scale descriptors are expanded upon in the ratings table and include key concepts relating to:

• safety and appropriateness (physical, psychological, cultural)
• the degree of assistance/prompting/monitoring required
• the level /application of knowledge and skills

It is recommended that the full scale is kept in view when allocating ratings (see Page 9 of the User Manual). Whole ratings only can be awarded-there are no half marks.

More specific written feedback about student performance related to each relevant learning objective is detailed in the feedback/recommendation space provided. Here the practice educator might:

• provide examples that support the ratings allocated
• detail examples of desired behaviours
• record overall comments about the learning objective
   

How is the final grade determined?

The minimum requirements for passing each learning objective are stipulated by specific scoring criteria (see Table 1, page 15 of the User Manual). Students must pass the relevant learning objective for each domain to achieve an overall pass. Practice educators also complete a summary statement regarding the student's overall performance.

Next ---> Navigating the SPEF-R^©