![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
The use of abbreviations is common throughout science. In many instances their use makes writing easier to read and understand. If you are writing about a particular chemical or enzyme which has a long name, it is often easier to refer to it by its shorter name. For example, you may be writing a research report about guanosine triphosphate and rather than typing out the name in full each time it may be simpler to use its recognised shortened name, GTP. Similarly you may be writing about a laboratory technique, capillary zone electrophoresis, and find it better to use CZE. However, excessive use of abbreviations
can make your writing obscure and difficult to read.
DNA was extracted from blood and analysed for the presence of factor V-L and factor II gene G20210A. In addition we measured anti-Thr, proteins C and S, and Ig-G. The patient had received DHAP 5 days previously, was on PICC and suffered a massive SVC immediately. Hyper-CVAD given IV but not SV or IM appeared to improve BP, HR, GFR and CAI.
Even if all the abbreviations
in this paragraph had been used in full and/or explained
earlier
this paragraph would be difficult to read and understand.
Since the reason to write is to communicate something,
you must ensure
your use of abbreviations enhances readability rather
than reduces it. ALWAYS
|
|||||||
| feedback |
|
Authorised by: Title of Authority Last modified: |