Summary of ASQA audit information

Summary of ASQA audit information


As a Pre-qualified Supplier under the User Choice 2010 – 2015 program, The University of Queensland and the Gatton Vocational Education Centre are required to publish audit information in relation to compliance with the Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA).

The User Choice program provides public funding paid directly to Pre-qualified Suppliers for the delivery of accredited entry-level training to eligible Apprentices and Trainees.

The ASQA is the national set of standards which assures nationally consistent, high-quality training and assessment services for the clients of Australia’s vocational education and training system.

An ASQA audit reviews evidence of an organisation's compliance with the requirements of the ASQA to confirm that it is achieving quality training and assessment outcomes.  The process also identifies opportunities for improvement on these outcomes.

This information is published to assist apprentices, trainees and their employers to make informed decisions regarding their selection of a Pre-qualified Supplier for the delivery of training and assessment services.

Audit Date: 4 July 2008

Qualifications audited

Qualification code:

21677VIC

 Qualification name:

Certificate III in Farriery

 

Audit Outcome

Rectification

Was non-compliance identified?

If 'Yes', non-compliance type

Summary of non-compliance

Actions taken to rectify the non-compliance

Has the non-compliance been rectified?

Yes/No

Minor, Significant, Critical

Yes/No

 No

 

 

 

 
Explanatory notes:

Non-compliance with the ASQA means that requirements of the have not been met based on the evidence reviewed. Non-compliances are categorised as minor, significant or critical. For the purposes of the User Choice 2010 – 2015 program, only significant and Critical non-compliances need to be published

  • Minor:            No, or minor, adverse impact on learners with no serious breakdown of provision of quality training and assessment.
  • Significant:    Significant adverse impact on learners with insufficient focus on quality training and assessment outcomes.
  • Critical:          Critical adverse impact on learners with widespread or persistent dissatisfaction with services and outcomes.

 

On this site